From 4849e8e44250e3f73df782aad750b0626c441241 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukasz Wojciechowski Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:24:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] test/security: introduce security lib tests This patch introduces set of unit tests of librte_security API functions. Tests are added to dpdk-test application and can be run with "security_autotest" runtime command. This is the first patch in the series of patches as adding all test cases for all API functions in a single patch would make it unreadable. This patch defines structure of the file and necessary test framework initialization. It also contains first subset of unit tests for rte_security_session_create API function. Structure of the tests file is following: - macros for making tests more readable; - mockup structures and functions for rte_security_ops; - test suite and test cases setup and teardown functions; - tests functions; - declaration of testcases. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski Acked-by: Akhil Goyal --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + app/test/Makefile | 2 + app/test/meson.build | 3 + app/test/test_security.c | 683 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 689 insertions(+) create mode 100644 app/test/test_security.c diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1bf00d7e56..7b81e2d1bb 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ M: Declan Doherty T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto F: lib/librte_security/ F: doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_security.rst +F: app/test/test_security.c Compression API - EXPERIMENTAL M: Fiona Trahe diff --git a/app/test/Makefile b/app/test/Makefile index 631a21028b..793daa687e 100644 --- a/app/test/Makefile +++ b/app/test/Makefile @@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_BPF) += test_bpf.c SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_RCU) += test_rcu_qsbr.c test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c +SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_SECURITY) += test_security.c + SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec.c SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test_ipsec_sad.c ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC),y) diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build index d15278cf90..285e71a461 100644 --- a/app/test/meson.build +++ b/app/test/meson.build @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ test_sources = files('commands.c', 'test_ring_stress.c', 'test_rwlock.c', 'test_sched.c', + 'test_security.c', 'test_service_cores.c', 'test_spinlock.c', 'test_stack.c', @@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ test_deps = ['acl', 'reorder', 'rib', 'ring', + 'security', 'stack', 'timer' ] @@ -216,6 +218,7 @@ fast_tests = [ ['rwlock_rds_wrm_autotest', true], ['rwlock_rde_wro_autotest', true], ['sched_autotest', true], + ['security_autotest', false], ['spinlock_autotest', true], ['stack_autotest', false], ['stack_lf_autotest', false], diff --git a/app/test/test_security.c b/app/test/test_security.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3fc83abae5 --- /dev/null +++ b/app/test/test_security.c @@ -0,0 +1,683 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause + * Copyright (c) 2020 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd All Rights Reserved + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* Before including rte_test.h file you can define + * RTE_TEST_TRACE_FAILURE(_file, _line, _func) macro to better trace/debug test + * failures. Mostly useful in development phase. + */ +#ifndef RTE_TEST_TRACE_FAILURE +#define RTE_TEST_TRACE_FAILURE(_file, _line, _func) \ + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "in %s:%d %s\n", _file, _line, _func) +#endif + +#include +#include "test.h" + +/** + * Security + * ======= + * + * Basic unit tests of the librte_security API. + * + * Structure of the file: + * - macros for making tests more readable; + * - mockup structures and functions for rte_security_ops; + * - test suite and test cases setup and teardown functions; + * - tests functions; + * - declaration of testcases. + */ + + +/** + * Macros + * + * Set of macros for making tests easier to read. + */ + +/** + * Verify condition inside mocked up function. + * Mockup function cannot return a test error, so the failure + * of assertion increases counter and print logs. + * The counter can be verified later to check if test case should fail. + * + * @param fail_counter fail counter + * @param cond condition expected to be true + * @param msg printf style formatting string for custom message + */ +#define MOCK_TEST_ASSERT(fail_counter, cond, msg, ...) do { \ + if (!(cond)) { \ + fail_counter++; \ + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Test assert %s line %d failed: " \ + msg "\n", __func__, __LINE__, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__); \ + RTE_TEST_TRACE_FAILURE(__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \ + } \ +} while (0) + +/** + * Verify equality condition inside mocked up function. + * Mockup function cannot return a test error, so the failure + * of assertion increases counter and print logs. + * The counter can be verified later to check if test case should fail. + * + * @param fail_counter fail counter + * @param a first value of comparison + * @param b second value of comparison + * @param msg printf style formatting string for custom message + */ +#define MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(fail_counter, a, b, msg, ...) \ + MOCK_TEST_ASSERT(fail_counter, (a) == (b), msg, ##__VA_ARGS__) + + +/** + * Verify if parameter of the mocked up function matches expected value. + * The expected value is stored in data structure in the field matching + * parameter name. + * + * @param data structure with expected values + * @param parameter name of the parameter (both field and parameter name) + * @param spec printf style spec for parameter + */ +#define MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_PARAMETER(data, parameter, spec) \ + MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(data.failed, data.parameter, parameter, \ + "Expecting parameter %s to be " spec \ + " but it's " spec, RTE_STR(parameter), \ + data.parameter, parameter) + +/** + * Wrap for MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_PARAMETER macro for pointer type parameters. + * + * @param data structure with expected values + * @param parameter name of the parameter (both field and parameter name) + */ +#define MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(data, parameter) \ + MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_PARAMETER(data, parameter, "%p") + +/** + * Verify number of calls of the mocked up function + * and check if there were any fails during execution. + * The fails statistics inside mocked up functions are collected + * as "failed" field in mockup structures. + * + * @param mock_data structure with statistics (called, failed) + * @param exp_calls expected number of mockup function calls + */ +#define TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_data, exp_calls) do { \ + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(exp_calls, mock_data.called, \ + "Expecting sub op to be called %d times, " \ + "but it's called %d times", \ + exp_calls, mock_data.called); \ + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, mock_data.failed, \ + "Expecting sub op asserts not to fail, " \ + "but they're failed %d times", \ + mock_data.failed); \ +} while (0) + +/** + * Assert tested function result match expected value + * + * @param f_name name of tested function + * @param f_ret value returned by the function + * @param exp_ret expected returned value + * @param fmt printf style format for returned value + */ +#define TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(f_name, f_ret, exp_ret, fmt) \ + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(exp_ret, f_ret, "Expecting " RTE_STR(f_name) \ + " to return " fmt ", but it returned " fmt \ + "\n", exp_ret, f_ret) + +/** + * Assert tested function result is not NULL + * + * @param f_name name of tested function + * @param f_ret value returned by the function + */ +#define TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_NOT_NULL(f_name, f_ret) \ + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(f_ret, "Expecting " RTE_STR(f_name) \ + " to return not NULL\n") + +/** + * Verify that sess_cnt counter value matches expected + * + * @param expected_sessions_count expected counter value + */ +#define TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(expected_sessions_count) do { \ + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; \ + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(expected_sessions_count, \ + ut_params->ctx.sess_cnt, \ + "Expecting session counter to be %u," \ + " but it's %u", expected_sessions_count, \ + ut_params->ctx.sess_cnt); \ +} while (0) + +/** + * Verify usage of mempool by checking if number of allocated objects matches + * expectations. The mempool is used to manage objects for sessions data. + * A single object is acquired from mempool during session_create + * and put back in session_destroy. + * + * @param expected_mempool_usage expected number of used mempool objects + */ +#define TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(expected_mempool_usage) do { \ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;\ + unsigned int mempool_usage; \ + mempool_usage = rte_mempool_in_use_count( \ + ts_params->session_mpool); \ + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(expected_mempool_usage, mempool_usage, \ + "Expecting %u mempool allocations, " \ + "but there are %u allocated objects", \ + expected_mempool_usage, mempool_usage); \ +} while (0) + + +/** + * Mockup structures and functions for rte_security_ops; + * + * Set of structures for controlling mockup functions calls. + * Every mockup function X has its corresponding X_data structure + * and an instance of that structure X_exp. + * Structure contains parameters that a mockup function is expected + * to be called with, a value to return (.ret) and 2 statistics: + * .called (number of times the mockup function was called) + * and .failed (number of assertion fails during mockup function call). + * + * Mockup functions verify that the parameters they are called with match + * expected values. The expected values should be stored in corresponding + * structures prior to mockup functions call. Every failure of such + * verification increases .failed counter. Every call of mockup function + * increases .called counter. Function returns value stored in .ret field + * of the structure. + * In case of some parameters in some functions the expected value is unknown + * and cannot be detrmined prior to call. Such parameters are stored + * in structure and can be compared or analyzed later in test case code. + * + * Below structures and functions follow the rules just described. + * Additional remarks and exceptions are added in comments. + */ + +/** + * session_create mockup + * + * Verified parameters: device, conf, mp. + * Saved, not verified parameters: sess. + */ +static struct mock_session_create_data { + void *device; + struct rte_security_session_conf *conf; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + struct rte_mempool *mp; + + int ret; + + int called; + int failed; +} mock_session_create_exp = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0}; + +static int +mock_session_create(void *device, + struct rte_security_session_conf *conf, + struct rte_security_session *sess, + struct rte_mempool *mp) +{ + mock_session_create_exp.called++; + + MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_create_exp, device); + MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_create_exp, conf); + MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_create_exp, mp); + + mock_session_create_exp.sess = sess; + + return mock_session_create_exp.ret; +} + +/** + * session_destroy mockup + * + * Verified parameters: device, sess. + */ +static struct mock_session_destroy_data { + void *device; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + int ret; + + int called; + int failed; +} mock_session_destroy_exp = {NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0}; + +static int +mock_session_destroy(void *device, struct rte_security_session *sess) +{ + mock_session_destroy_exp.called++; + + MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_destroy_exp, device); + MOCK_TEST_ASSERT_POINTER_PARAMETER(mock_session_destroy_exp, sess); + + return mock_session_destroy_exp.ret; +} + +/** + * empty_ops + * + * is an empty security operations set (all function pointers set to NULL) + */ +struct rte_security_ops empty_ops = { NULL }; + +/** + * mock_ops + * + * is a security operations set using mockup functions + */ +struct rte_security_ops mock_ops = { + .session_create = mock_session_create, + .session_destroy = mock_session_destroy, +}; + + +/** + * Test suite and test cases setup and teardown functions. + */ + +/** + * struct security_testsuite_params defines parameters initialized once + * for whole tests suite. + * Currently the only stored parameter is session_mpool a mempool created + * once in testsuite_setup and released in testsuite_teardown. + * The instance of this structure is stored in testsuite_params variable. + */ +static struct security_testsuite_params { + struct rte_mempool *session_mpool; +} testsuite_params = { NULL }; + +/** + * struct security_unittest_params defines parameters initialized + * for every test case. The parameters are initialized in ut_setup + * and released in ut_teardown. + * The instance of this structure is stored in unittest_params variable. + */ +static struct security_unittest_params { + struct rte_security_ctx ctx; + struct rte_security_session_conf conf; + struct rte_security_session *sess; +} unittest_params = { + .ctx = { + .device = NULL, + .ops = &mock_ops, + .sess_cnt = 0, + }, + .sess = NULL, +}; + +#define SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_NAME "SecurityTestsMempoolName" +#define SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE 15 +#define SECURITY_TEST_SESSION_OBJECT_SIZE sizeof(struct rte_security_session) + +/** + * testsuite_setup initializes whole test suite parameters. + * It creates a new mempool used in all test cases + * and verifies if it properly created. + */ +static int +testsuite_setup(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + ts_params->session_mpool = rte_mempool_create( + SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_NAME, + SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE, + SECURITY_TEST_SESSION_OBJECT_SIZE, + 0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, + SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0); + TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ts_params->session_mpool, + "Cannot create mempool %s\n", rte_strerror(rte_errno)); + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * testsuite_teardown releases test suite wide parameters. + */ +static void +testsuite_teardown(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + if (ts_params->session_mpool) { + rte_mempool_free(ts_params->session_mpool); + ts_params->session_mpool = NULL; + } +} + +/** + * ut_setup initializes test case parameters to default values. + * It resets also any .called and .failed statistics of mockup functions + * usage. + */ +static int +ut_setup(void) +{ + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + ut_params->ctx.device = NULL; + ut_params->ctx.ops = &mock_ops; + ut_params->ctx.sess_cnt = 0; + ut_params->sess = NULL; + + mock_session_create_exp.called = 0; + mock_session_destroy_exp.called = 0; + + mock_session_create_exp.failed = 0; + mock_session_destroy_exp.failed = 0; + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * destroy_session_with_check is a helper function releasing session + * created with rte_security_session_create and stored in test case parameters. + * It's used both to release sessions created in test cases' bodies + * which are assigned to ut_params->sess + */ +static int +destroy_session_with_check(void) +{ + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + if (ut_params->sess != NULL) { + /* Assure that mockup function for destroy operation is set. */ + ut_params->ctx.ops = &mock_ops; + + mock_session_destroy_exp.device = NULL; + mock_session_destroy_exp.sess = ut_params->sess; + mock_session_destroy_exp.ret = 0; + mock_session_destroy_exp.called = 0; + mock_session_destroy_exp.failed = 0; + + int ret = rte_security_session_destroy(&ut_params->ctx, + ut_params->sess); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_destroy, + ret, 0, "%d"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_destroy_exp, 1); + + ut_params->sess = NULL; + } + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * ut_teardown releases test case parameters. + */ +static void +ut_teardown(void) +{ + destroy_session_with_check(); +} + + +/** + * Test functions + * + * Each test function is related to a single test case. + * They are arranged by tested rte_security API function + * and by rte_security execution paths sequence in code. + */ + +/** + * rte_security_session_create tests + */ + +/** + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with NULL instance + */ +static int +test_session_create_inv_context(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + sess = rte_security_session_create(NULL, &ut_params->conf, + ts_params->session_mpool); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create, + sess, NULL, "%p"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(0); + TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(0); + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with invalid + * security operations structure (NULL) + */ +static int +test_session_create_inv_context_ops(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + ut_params->ctx.ops = NULL; + + sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf, + ts_params->session_mpool); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create, + sess, NULL, "%p"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(0); + TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(0); + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with empty + * security operations + */ +static int +test_session_create_inv_context_ops_fun(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + ut_params->ctx.ops = &empty_ops; + + sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf, + ts_params->session_mpool); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create, + sess, NULL, "%p"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(0); + TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(0); + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with NULL conf parameter + */ +static int +test_session_create_inv_configuration(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, NULL, + ts_params->session_mpool); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create, + sess, NULL, "%p"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(0); + TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(0); + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create with NULL mp parameter + */ +static int +test_session_create_inv_mempool(void) +{ + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf, + NULL); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create, + sess, NULL, "%p"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(0); + TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(0); + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create in case when mempool + * is fully used and no object can be got from it + */ +static int +test_session_create_mempool_empty(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + struct rte_security_session *tmp[SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE]; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + /* Get all available objects from mempool. */ + int i, ret; + for (i = 0; i < SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE; ++i) { + ret = rte_mempool_get(ts_params->session_mpool, + (void **)(&tmp[i])); + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, ret, + "Expect getting %d object from mempool" + " to succeed", i); + } + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE); + + sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf, + ts_params->session_mpool); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create, + sess, NULL, "%p"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 0); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE); + TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(0); + + /* Put objects back to the pool. */ + for (i = 0; i < SECURITY_TEST_MEMPOOL_SIZE; ++i) + rte_mempool_put(ts_params->session_mpool, (void *)(tmp[i])); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(0); + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create when session_create + * security operation fails + */ +static int +test_session_create_ops_failure(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + mock_session_create_exp.device = NULL; + mock_session_create_exp.conf = &ut_params->conf; + mock_session_create_exp.mp = ts_params->session_mpool; + mock_session_create_exp.ret = -1; /* Return failure status. */ + + sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf, + ts_params->session_mpool); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_RET(rte_security_session_create, + sess, NULL, "%p"); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 1); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(0); + TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(0); + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + +/** + * Test execution of rte_security_session_create in successful execution path + */ +static int +test_session_create_success(void) +{ + struct security_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params; + struct security_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; + struct rte_security_session *sess; + + mock_session_create_exp.device = NULL; + mock_session_create_exp.conf = &ut_params->conf; + mock_session_create_exp.mp = ts_params->session_mpool; + mock_session_create_exp.ret = 0; /* Return success status. */ + + sess = rte_security_session_create(&ut_params->ctx, &ut_params->conf, + ts_params->session_mpool); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_FUNCTION_CALL_NOT_NULL(rte_security_session_create, + sess); + TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(sess, mock_session_create_exp.sess, + "Expecting session_create to be called with %p sess" + " parameter, but it's called %p sess parameter", + sess, mock_session_create_exp.sess); + TEST_ASSERT_MOCK_CALLS(mock_session_create_exp, 1); + TEST_ASSERT_MEMPOOL_USAGE(1); + TEST_ASSERT_SESSION_COUNT(1); + + /* + * Store created session in test case parameters, so it can be released + * after test case in ut_teardown by destroy_session_with_check. + */ + ut_params->sess = sess; + + return TEST_SUCCESS; +} + + +/** + * Declaration of testcases + */ +static struct unit_test_suite security_testsuite = { + .suite_name = "generic security", + .setup = testsuite_setup, + .teardown = testsuite_teardown, + .unit_test_cases = { + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, + test_session_create_inv_context), + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, + test_session_create_inv_context_ops), + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, + test_session_create_inv_context_ops_fun), + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, + test_session_create_inv_configuration), + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, + test_session_create_inv_mempool), + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, + test_session_create_mempool_empty), + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, + test_session_create_ops_failure), + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown, + test_session_create_success), + + TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */ + } +}; + +static int +test_security(void) +{ + rte_log_set_global_level(RTE_LOG_DEBUG); + rte_log_set_level(RTE_LOGTYPE_EAL, RTE_LOG_DEBUG); + + return unit_test_suite_runner(&security_testsuite); +} + +REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(security_autotest, test_security); -- 2.20.1