From 84b63b5c59dd2a9db31a78911dfa9cf67e86ccd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Rybchenko Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:03:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] net/sfc: decrease number of variables maintained on EF10 Rx Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko Reviewed-by: Ivan Malov --- drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c index 0986102109..d4af07d44e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ sfc_ef10_rx_prefetch_next(struct sfc_ef10_rxq *rxq, unsigned int next_id) } } -static uint16_t +static struct rte_mbuf ** sfc_ef10_rx_prepared(struct sfc_ef10_rxq *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts) { @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ sfc_ef10_rx_prepared(struct sfc_ef10_rxq *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, } while (completed != rxq->completed); } - return n_rx_pkts; + return rx_pkts; } static uint16_t @@ -219,9 +219,10 @@ sfc_ef10_rx_pseudo_hdr_get_hash(const uint8_t *pseudo_hdr) return rte_le_to_cpu_32(*(const uint32_t *)pseudo_hdr); } -static uint16_t +static struct rte_mbuf ** sfc_ef10_rx_process_event(struct sfc_ef10_rxq *rxq, efx_qword_t rx_ev, - struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts) + struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, + struct rte_mbuf ** const rx_pkts_end) { const unsigned int ptr_mask = rxq->ptr_mask; unsigned int completed = rxq->completed; @@ -246,10 +247,10 @@ sfc_ef10_rx_process_event(struct sfc_ef10_rxq *rxq, efx_qword_t rx_ev, rxd = &rxq->sw_ring[completed++ & ptr_mask]; rte_mbuf_raw_free(rxd->mbuf); } - return 0; + return rx_pkts; } - n_rx_pkts = RTE_MIN(ready, nb_pkts); + n_rx_pkts = RTE_MIN(ready, rx_pkts_end - rx_pkts); rxq->prepared = ready - n_rx_pkts; rxq->completed += n_rx_pkts; @@ -329,7 +330,7 @@ sfc_ef10_rx_process_event(struct sfc_ef10_rxq *rxq, efx_qword_t rx_ev, SFC_ASSERT(m->next == NULL); } - return n_rx_pkts; + return rx_pkts; } static bool @@ -361,26 +362,25 @@ static uint16_t sfc_ef10_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts) { struct sfc_ef10_rxq *rxq = sfc_ef10_rxq_by_dp_rxq(rx_queue); + struct rte_mbuf ** const rx_pkts_end = &rx_pkts[nb_pkts]; unsigned int evq_old_read_ptr; - uint16_t n_rx_pkts; efx_qword_t rx_ev; - n_rx_pkts = sfc_ef10_rx_prepared(rxq, rx_pkts, nb_pkts); + rx_pkts = sfc_ef10_rx_prepared(rxq, rx_pkts, nb_pkts); if (unlikely(rxq->flags & (SFC_EF10_RXQ_NOT_RUNNING | SFC_EF10_RXQ_EXCEPTION))) goto done; evq_old_read_ptr = rxq->evq_read_ptr; - while (n_rx_pkts != nb_pkts && sfc_ef10_rx_get_event(rxq, &rx_ev)) { + while (rx_pkts != rx_pkts_end && sfc_ef10_rx_get_event(rxq, &rx_ev)) { /* * DROP_EVENT is an internal to the NIC, software should * never see it and, therefore, may ignore it. */ - n_rx_pkts += sfc_ef10_rx_process_event(rxq, rx_ev, - rx_pkts + n_rx_pkts, - nb_pkts - n_rx_pkts); + rx_pkts = sfc_ef10_rx_process_event(rxq, rx_ev, + rx_pkts, rx_pkts_end); } sfc_ef10_ev_qclear(rxq->evq_hw_ring, rxq->ptr_mask, evq_old_read_ptr, @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ sfc_ef10_recv_pkts(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts) sfc_ef10_rx_qrefill(rxq); done: - return n_rx_pkts; + return nb_pkts - (rx_pkts_end - rx_pkts); } const uint32_t * -- 2.20.1