net/sfc: fix an Rx queue double release possibility
authorIgor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:31:35 +0000 (08:31 +0100)
committerFerruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Thu, 27 Sep 2018 23:41:02 +0000 (01:41 +0200)
There are two function that call sfc_rx_qfini():
sfc_rx_fini_queues() and sfc_rx_queue_release(). But only
sfc_rx_queue_release() sets rx_queues pointer of the device data to NULL.
It may lead to the scenario in which a queue is destroyed by
sfc_rx_fini_queues() and after the queue is attempted to be destroyed again
by sfc_rx_queue_release().

Move NULL assignment to sfc_rx_qfini().

Fixes: ce35b05c635e ("net/sfc: implement Rx queue setup release operations")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.romanov@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c

index 435bde6..23778c9 100644 (file)
@@ -444,8 +444,6 @@ sfc_rx_queue_release(void *queue)
 
        sfc_log_init(sa, "RxQ=%u", sw_index);
 
-       sa->eth_dev->data->rx_queues[sw_index] = NULL;
-
        sfc_rx_qfini(sa, sw_index);
 
        sfc_adapter_unlock(sa);
index 338184d..58c57ac 100644 (file)
@@ -1103,6 +1103,7 @@ sfc_rx_qfini(struct sfc_adapter *sa, unsigned int sw_index)
        struct sfc_rxq *rxq;
 
        SFC_ASSERT(sw_index < sa->rxq_count);
+       sa->eth_dev->data->rx_queues[sw_index] = NULL;
 
        rxq_info = &sa->rxq_info[sw_index];