* The atomic_* is an expensive operation,Since it is a functional test,
* We are using the atomic_ operation to reduce the code complexity.
*/
- rte_atomic64_t outstand_pkts;
+ uint64_t outstand_pkts;
enum evt_test_result result;
uint32_t nb_flows;
uint64_t nb_pkts;
order_process_stage_1(struct test_order *const t,
struct rte_event *const ev, const uint32_t nb_flows,
uint32_t *const expected_flow_seq,
- rte_atomic64_t *const outstand_pkts)
+ uint64_t *const outstand_pkts)
{
const uint32_t flow = (uintptr_t)ev->mbuf % nb_flows;
/* compare the seqn against expected value */
*/
expected_flow_seq[flow]++;
rte_pktmbuf_free(ev->mbuf);
- rte_atomic64_sub(outstand_pkts, 1);
+ __atomic_sub_fetch(outstand_pkts, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
}
static __rte_always_inline void
const uint8_t port = w->port_id;\
const uint32_t nb_flows = t->nb_flows;\
uint32_t *expected_flow_seq = t->expected_flow_seq;\
- rte_atomic64_t *outstand_pkts = &t->outstand_pkts;\
+ uint64_t *outstand_pkts = &t->outstand_pkts;\
if (opt->verbose_level > 1)\
printf("%s(): lcore %d dev_id %d port=%d\n",\
__func__, rte_lcore_id(), dev_id, port)