common/sfc_efx/base: update EF100 registers definitions
[dpdk.git] / drivers / common / sfc_efx / base / efx_mae.c
index 6481a4e..c22206e 100644 (file)
@@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ efx_mae_get_limits(
        emlp->eml_encap_types_supported = maep->em_encap_types_supported;
        emlp->eml_encap_header_size_limit =
            MC_CMD_MAE_ENCAP_HEADER_ALLOC_IN_HDR_DATA_MAXNUM_MCDI2;
+       emlp->eml_max_n_counters = maep->em_max_ncounters;
 
        return (0);
 
@@ -1191,6 +1192,7 @@ efx_mae_action_set_spec_init(
        }
 
        spec->ema_rsrc.emar_eh_id.id = EFX_MAE_RSRC_ID_INVALID;
+       spec->ema_rsrc.emar_counter_id.id = EFX_MAE_RSRC_ID_INVALID;
 
        *specp = spec;
 
@@ -1358,6 +1360,50 @@ fail1:
        return (rc);
 }
 
+static __checkReturn                   efx_rc_t
+efx_mae_action_set_add_count(
+       __in                            efx_mae_actions_t *spec,
+       __in                            size_t arg_size,
+       __in_bcount(arg_size)           const uint8_t *arg)
+{
+       efx_rc_t rc;
+
+       EFX_STATIC_ASSERT(EFX_MAE_RSRC_ID_INVALID ==
+                         MC_CMD_MAE_COUNTER_ALLOC_OUT_COUNTER_ID_NULL);
+
+       /*
+        * Preparing an action set spec to update a counter requires
+        * two steps: first add this action to the action spec, and then
+        * add the counter ID to the spec. This allows validity checking
+        * and resource allocation to be done separately.
+        * Mark the counter ID as invalid in the spec to ensure that the
+        * caller must also invoke efx_mae_action_set_fill_in_counter_id()
+        * before action set allocation.
+        */
+       spec->ema_rsrc.emar_counter_id.id = EFX_MAE_RSRC_ID_INVALID;
+
+       /* Nothing else is supposed to take place over here. */
+       if (arg_size != 0) {
+               rc = EINVAL;
+               goto fail1;
+       }
+
+       if (arg != NULL) {
+               rc = EINVAL;
+               goto fail2;
+       }
+
+       ++(spec->ema_n_count_actions);
+
+       return (0);
+
+fail2:
+       EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
+fail1:
+       EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, efx_rc_t, rc);
+       return (rc);
+}
+
 static __checkReturn                   efx_rc_t
 efx_mae_action_set_add_flag(
        __in                            efx_mae_actions_t *spec,
@@ -1466,6 +1512,9 @@ static const efx_mae_action_desc_t efx_mae_actions[EFX_MAE_NACTIONS] = {
        [EFX_MAE_ACTION_ENCAP] = {
                .emad_add = efx_mae_action_set_add_encap
        },
+       [EFX_MAE_ACTION_COUNT] = {
+               .emad_add = efx_mae_action_set_add_count
+       },
        [EFX_MAE_ACTION_FLAG] = {
                .emad_add = efx_mae_action_set_add_flag
        },
@@ -1481,6 +1530,12 @@ static const uint32_t efx_mae_action_ordered_map =
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_DECAP) |
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_VLAN_POP) |
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH) |
+       /*
+        * HW will conduct action COUNT after
+        * the matching packet has been modified by
+        * length-affecting actions except for ENCAP.
+        */
+       (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_COUNT) |
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_ENCAP) |
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_FLAG) |
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_MARK) |
@@ -1492,12 +1547,14 @@ static const uint32_t efx_mae_action_ordered_map =
  * strictly ordered actions.
  */
 static const uint32_t efx_mae_action_nonstrict_map =
+       (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_COUNT) |
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_FLAG) |
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_MARK);
 
 static const uint32_t efx_mae_action_repeat_map =
        (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_VLAN_POP) |
-       (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH);
+       (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH) |
+       (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_COUNT);
 
 /*
  * Add an action to an action set.
@@ -1620,6 +1677,20 @@ efx_mae_action_set_populate_encap(
            EFX_MAE_ACTION_ENCAP, 0, NULL));
 }
 
+       __checkReturn                   efx_rc_t
+efx_mae_action_set_populate_count(
+       __in                            efx_mae_actions_t *spec)
+{
+       /*
+        * There is no argument to pass counter ID, thus, one does not
+        * need to allocate a counter while parsing application input.
+        * This is useful since building an action set may be done simply to
+        * validate a rule, whilst resource allocation usually consumes time.
+        */
+       return (efx_mae_action_set_spec_populate(spec,
+           EFX_MAE_ACTION_COUNT, 0, NULL));
+}
+
        __checkReturn                   efx_rc_t
 efx_mae_action_set_populate_flag(
        __in                            efx_mae_actions_t *spec)
@@ -2306,8 +2377,6 @@ efx_mae_action_set_alloc(
         */
        MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD(req,
            MAE_ACTION_SET_ALLOC_IN_COUNTER_LIST_ID, EFX_MAE_RSRC_ID_INVALID);
-       MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD(req,
-           MAE_ACTION_SET_ALLOC_IN_COUNTER_ID, EFX_MAE_RSRC_ID_INVALID);
 
        if ((spec->ema_actions & (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_DECAP)) != 0) {
                MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD_FIELD(req, MAE_ACTION_SET_ALLOC_IN_FLAGS,
@@ -2344,6 +2413,8 @@ efx_mae_action_set_alloc(
 
        MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD(req, MAE_ACTION_SET_ALLOC_IN_ENCAP_HEADER_ID,
            spec->ema_rsrc.emar_eh_id.id);
+       MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD(req, MAE_ACTION_SET_ALLOC_IN_COUNTER_ID,
+           spec->ema_rsrc.emar_counter_id.id);
 
        if ((spec->ema_actions & (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_FLAG)) != 0) {
                MCDI_IN_SET_DWORD_FIELD(req, MAE_ACTION_SET_ALLOC_IN_FLAGS,
@@ -2388,6 +2459,64 @@ efx_mae_action_set_alloc(
 
        return (0);
 
+fail4:
+       EFSYS_PROBE(fail4);
+fail3:
+       EFSYS_PROBE(fail3);
+fail2:
+       EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
+fail1:
+       EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, efx_rc_t, rc);
+       return (rc);
+}
+
+       __checkReturn                   unsigned int
+efx_mae_action_set_get_nb_count(
+       __in                            const efx_mae_actions_t *spec)
+{
+       return (spec->ema_n_count_actions);
+}
+
+       __checkReturn                   efx_rc_t
+efx_mae_action_set_fill_in_counter_id(
+       __in                            efx_mae_actions_t *spec,
+       __in                            const efx_counter_t *counter_idp)
+{
+       efx_rc_t rc;
+
+       if ((spec->ema_actions & (1U << EFX_MAE_ACTION_COUNT)) == 0) {
+               /*
+                * Invalid to add counter ID if spec does not have COUNT action.
+                */
+               rc = EINVAL;
+               goto fail1;
+       }
+
+       if (spec->ema_n_count_actions != 1) {
+               /*
+                * Having multiple COUNT actions in the spec requires a counter
+                * list to be used. This API must only be used for a single
+                * counter per spec. Turn down the request as inappropriate.
+                */
+               rc = EINVAL;
+               goto fail2;
+       }
+
+       if (spec->ema_rsrc.emar_counter_id.id != EFX_MAE_RSRC_ID_INVALID) {
+               /* The caller attempts to indicate counter ID twice. */
+               rc = EALREADY;
+               goto fail3;
+       }
+
+       if (counter_idp->id == EFX_MAE_RSRC_ID_INVALID) {
+               rc = EINVAL;
+               goto fail4;
+       }
+
+       spec->ema_rsrc.emar_counter_id.id = counter_idp->id;
+
+       return (0);
+
 fail4:
        EFSYS_PROBE(fail4);
 fail3: