#include <ethdev_driver.h>
#include <rte_io.h>
-#include "hns3_ethdev.h"
+#include "hns3_common.h"
#include "hns3_regs.h"
#include "hns3_logs.h"
#include "hns3_intr.h"
return -EIO;
}
+static void
+hns3_mbx_proc_timeout(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode)
+{
+ if (hw->mbx_resp.matching_scheme ==
+ HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_ORIGINAL) {
+ hw->mbx_resp.lost++;
+ hns3_err(hw,
+ "VF could not get mbx(%u,%u) head(%u) tail(%u) "
+ "lost(%u) from PF",
+ code, subcode, hw->mbx_resp.head, hw->mbx_resp.tail,
+ hw->mbx_resp.lost);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ hns3_err(hw, "VF could not get mbx(%u,%u) from PF", code, subcode);
+}
+
static int
-hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code0, uint16_t code1,
+hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode,
uint8_t *resp_data, uint16_t resp_len)
{
-#define HNS3_MAX_RETRY_MS 500
#define HNS3_WAIT_RESP_US 100
+#define US_PER_MS 1000
+ uint32_t mbx_time_limit;
struct hns3_adapter *hns = HNS3_DEV_HW_TO_ADAPTER(hw);
struct hns3_mbx_resp_status *mbx_resp;
- uint64_t now;
- uint64_t end;
+ uint32_t wait_time = 0;
+ bool received;
if (resp_len > HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE) {
hns3_err(hw, "VF mbx response len(=%u) exceeds maximum(=%d)",
return -EINVAL;
}
- now = get_timeofday_ms();
- end = now + HNS3_MAX_RETRY_MS;
- while ((hw->mbx_resp.head != hw->mbx_resp.tail + hw->mbx_resp.lost) &&
- (now < end)) {
+ mbx_time_limit = (uint32_t)hns->mbx_time_limit_ms * US_PER_MS;
+ while (wait_time < mbx_time_limit) {
if (__atomic_load_n(&hw->reset.disable_cmd, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
- hns3_err(hw, "Don't wait for mbx respone because of "
+ hns3_err(hw, "Don't wait for mbx response because of "
"disable_cmd");
return -EBUSY;
}
if (is_reset_pending(hns)) {
hw->mbx_resp.req_msg_data = 0;
- hns3_err(hw, "Don't wait for mbx respone because of "
+ hns3_err(hw, "Don't wait for mbx response because of "
"reset pending");
return -EIO;
}
hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
rte_delay_us(HNS3_WAIT_RESP_US);
- now = get_timeofday_ms();
+ if (hw->mbx_resp.matching_scheme ==
+ HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_ORIGINAL)
+ received = (hw->mbx_resp.head ==
+ hw->mbx_resp.tail + hw->mbx_resp.lost);
+ else
+ received = hw->mbx_resp.received_match_resp;
+ if (received)
+ break;
+
+ wait_time += HNS3_WAIT_RESP_US;
}
hw->mbx_resp.req_msg_data = 0;
- if (now >= end) {
- hw->mbx_resp.lost++;
- hns3_err(hw,
- "VF could not get mbx(%u,%u) head(%u) tail(%u) "
- "lost(%u) from PF",
- code0, code1, hw->mbx_resp.head, hw->mbx_resp.tail,
- hw->mbx_resp.lost);
+ if (wait_time >= mbx_time_limit) {
+ hns3_mbx_proc_timeout(hw, code, subcode);
return -ETIME;
}
rte_io_rmb();
return 0;
}
+static void
+hns3_mbx_prepare_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode)
+{
+ /*
+ * Init both matching scheme fields because we may not know the exact
+ * scheme will be used when in the initial phase.
+ *
+ * Also, there are OK to init both matching scheme fields even though
+ * we get the exact scheme which is used.
+ */
+ hw->mbx_resp.req_msg_data = (uint32_t)code << 16 | subcode;
+ hw->mbx_resp.head++;
+
+ /* Update match_id and ensure the value of match_id is not zero */
+ hw->mbx_resp.match_id++;
+ if (hw->mbx_resp.match_id == 0)
+ hw->mbx_resp.match_id = 1;
+ hw->mbx_resp.received_match_resp = false;
+
+ hw->mbx_resp.resp_status = 0;
+ memset(hw->mbx_resp.additional_info, 0, HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE);
+}
+
int
hns3_send_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode,
const uint8_t *msg_data, uint8_t msg_len, bool need_resp,
if (need_resp) {
req->mbx_need_resp |= HNS3_MBX_NEED_RESP_BIT;
rte_spinlock_lock(&hw->mbx_resp.lock);
- hw->mbx_resp.req_msg_data = (uint32_t)code << 16 | subcode;
- hw->mbx_resp.head++;
+ hns3_mbx_prepare_resp(hw, code, subcode);
+ req->match_id = hw->mbx_resp.match_id;
ret = hns3_cmd_send(hw, &desc, 1);
if (ret) {
hw->mbx_resp.head--;
resp->tail = tail;
}
+static void
+hns3_handle_mbx_response(struct hns3_hw *hw, struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req)
+{
+ struct hns3_mbx_resp_status *resp = &hw->mbx_resp;
+ uint32_t msg_data;
+
+ if (req->match_id != 0) {
+ /*
+ * If match_id is not zero, it means PF support copy request's
+ * match_id to its response. So VF could use the match_id
+ * to match the request.
+ */
+ if (resp->matching_scheme !=
+ HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_MATCH_ID) {
+ resp->matching_scheme =
+ HNS3_MBX_RESP_MATCHING_SCHEME_OF_MATCH_ID;
+ hns3_info(hw, "detect mailbox support match id!");
+ }
+ if (req->match_id == resp->match_id) {
+ resp->resp_status = hns3_resp_to_errno(req->msg[3]);
+ memcpy(resp->additional_info, &req->msg[4],
+ HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE);
+ rte_io_wmb();
+ resp->received_match_resp = true;
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the below instructions can be executed, it means PF does not
+ * support copy request's match_id to its response. So VF follows the
+ * original scheme to process.
+ */
+ resp->resp_status = hns3_resp_to_errno(req->msg[3]);
+ memcpy(resp->additional_info, &req->msg[4],
+ HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE);
+ msg_data = (uint32_t)req->msg[1] << 16 | req->msg[2];
+ hns3_update_resp_position(hw, msg_data);
+}
+
static void
hns3_link_fail_parse(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint8_t link_fail_code)
{
static void
hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(struct hns3_hw *hw,
- struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req)
+ struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *req)
{
#define LINK_STATUS_OFFSET 1
#define LINK_FAIL_CODE_OFFSET 2
}
}
+static void
+hns3_handle_mbx_msg_out_intr(struct hns3_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct hns3_cmq_ring *crq = &hw->cmq.crq;
+ struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req;
+ struct hns3_cmd_desc *desc;
+ uint32_t tail, next_to_use;
+ uint8_t opcode;
+ uint16_t flag;
+
+ tail = hns3_read_dev(hw, HNS3_CMDQ_RX_TAIL_REG);
+ next_to_use = crq->next_to_use;
+ while (next_to_use != tail) {
+ desc = &crq->desc[next_to_use];
+ req = (struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *)desc->data;
+ opcode = req->msg[0] & 0xff;
+
+ flag = rte_le_to_cpu_16(crq->desc[next_to_use].flag);
+ if (!hns3_get_bit(flag, HNS3_CMDQ_RX_OUTVLD_B))
+ goto scan_next;
+
+ if (crq->desc[next_to_use].opcode == 0)
+ goto scan_next;
+
+ if (opcode == HNS3_MBX_PF_VF_RESP) {
+ hns3_handle_mbx_response(hw, req);
+ /*
+ * Clear opcode to inform intr thread don't process
+ * again.
+ */
+ crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].opcode = 0;
+ }
+
+scan_next:
+ next_to_use = (next_to_use + 1) % hw->cmq.crq.desc_num;
+ }
+
+ crq->next_to_use = next_to_use;
+ hns3_write_dev(hw, HNS3_CMDQ_RX_HEAD_REG, crq->next_to_use);
+}
+
void
hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
{
- struct hns3_mbx_resp_status *resp = &hw->mbx_resp;
+ struct hns3_adapter *hns = HNS3_DEV_HW_TO_ADAPTER(hw);
struct hns3_cmq_ring *crq = &hw->cmq.crq;
struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req;
struct hns3_cmd_desc *desc;
- uint32_t msg_data;
+ bool handle_out;
uint8_t opcode;
uint16_t flag;
- uint8_t *temp;
- int i;
rte_spinlock_lock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
+ handle_out = (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY ||
+ !rte_thread_is_intr()) && hns->is_vf;
+ if (handle_out) {
+ /*
+ * Currently, any threads in the primary and secondary processes
+ * could send mailbox sync request, so it will need to process
+ * the crq message (which is the HNS3_MBX_PF_VF_RESP) in there
+ * own thread context. It may also process other messages
+ * because it uses the policy of processing all pending messages
+ * at once.
+ * But some messages such as HNS3_MBX_PUSH_LINK_STATUS could
+ * only process within the intr thread in primary process,
+ * otherwise it may lead to report lsc event in secondary
+ * process.
+ * So the threads other than intr thread in primary process
+ * could only process HNS3_MBX_PF_VF_RESP message, if the
+ * message processed, its opcode will rewrite with zero, then
+ * the intr thread in primary process will not process again.
+ */
+ hns3_handle_mbx_msg_out_intr(hw);
+ rte_spinlock_unlock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
+ return;
+ }
+
while (!hns3_cmd_crq_empty(hw)) {
if (__atomic_load_n(&hw->reset.disable_cmd, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
rte_spinlock_unlock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
continue;
}
+ handle_out = hns->is_vf && desc->opcode == 0;
+ if (handle_out) {
+ /* Message already processed by other thread */
+ crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag = 0;
+ hns3_mbx_ring_ptr_move_crq(crq);
+ continue;
+ }
+
switch (opcode) {
case HNS3_MBX_PF_VF_RESP:
- resp->resp_status = hns3_resp_to_errno(req->msg[3]);
-
- temp = (uint8_t *)&req->msg[4];
- for (i = 0; i < HNS3_MBX_MAX_RESP_DATA_SIZE; i++) {
- resp->additional_info[i] = *temp;
- temp++;
- }
- msg_data = (uint32_t)req->msg[1] << 16 | req->msg[2];
- hns3_update_resp_position(hw, msg_data);
+ hns3_handle_mbx_response(hw, req);
break;
case HNS3_MBX_LINK_STAT_CHANGE:
hns3vf_handle_link_change_event(hw, req);
hns3_handle_asserting_reset(hw, req);
break;
case HNS3_MBX_PUSH_LINK_STATUS:
- hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(hw, req);
+ /*
+ * This message is reported by the firmware and is
+ * reported in 'struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd' format.
+ * Therefore, we should cast the req variable to
+ * 'struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd' and then process it.
+ */
+ hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(hw,
+ (struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *)req);
break;
case HNS3_MBX_PUSH_VLAN_INFO:
/*
hns3_handle_promisc_info(hw, req->msg[1]);
break;
default:
- hns3_err(hw,
- "VF received unsupported(%u) mbx msg from PF",
- req->msg[0]);
+ hns3_err(hw, "received unsupported(%u) mbx msg",
+ opcode);
break;
}