net/mlx5: support Direct Rules E-Switch

[dpdk.git] / drivers / net / mlx5 / mlx5_rxtx_vec.h

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h
index 5df8e29..4220b08 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.h
@@ -102,9 +102,21 @@ mlx5_rx_replenish_bulk_mbuf(struct mlx5_rxq_data *rxq, uint16_t n)
                return;
        }
        for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
-               void *buf_addr = rte_mbuf_buf_addr(elts[i], rxq->mp);
+               void *buf_addr;
 
+               /*
+                * Load the virtual address for Rx WQE. non-x86 processors
+                * (mostly RISC such as ARM and Power) are more vulnerable to
+                * load stall. For x86, reducing the number of instructions
+                * seems to matter most.
+                */
+#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
+               buf_addr = elts[i]->buf_addr;
+               assert(buf_addr == rte_mbuf_buf_addr(elts[i], rxq->mp));
+#else
+               buf_addr = rte_mbuf_buf_addr(elts[i], rxq->mp);
                assert(buf_addr == elts[i]->buf_addr);
+#endif
                wq[i].addr = rte_cpu_to_be_64((uintptr_t)buf_addr +
                                              RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
                /* If there's only one MR, no need to replace LKey in WQE. */