power: add traffic pattern aware power control
1. Abstract
For packet processing workloads such as DPDK polling is continuous.
This means CPU cores always show 100% busy independent of how much work
those cores are doing. It is critical to accurately determine how busy
a core is hugely important for the following reasons:
* No indication of overload conditions.
* User does not know how much real load is on a system, resulting
in wasted energy as no power management is utilized.
Compared to the original l3fwd-power design, instead of going to sleep
after detecting an empty poll, the new mechanism just lowers the core
frequency. As a result, the application does not stop polling the device,
which leads to improved handling of bursts of traffic.
When the system become busy, the empty poll mechanism can also increase the
core frequency (including turbo) to do best effort for intensive traffic.
This gives us more flexible and balanced traffic awareness over the
standard l3fwd-power application.
2. Proposed solution
The proposed solution focuses on how many times empty polls are executed.
The less the number of empty polls, means current core is busy with
processing workload, therefore, the higher frequency is needed. The high
empty poll number indicates the current core not doing any real work
therefore, we can lower the frequency to safe power.
In the current implementation, each core has 1 empty-poll counter which
assume 1 core is dedicated to 1 queue. This will need to be expanded in the
future to support multiple queues per core.
2.1 Power state definition:
LOW: Not currently used, reserved for future use.
MED: the frequency is used to process modest traffic workload.
HIGH: the frequency is used to process busy traffic workload.
2.2 There are two phases to establish the power management system:
a.Initialization/Training phase. The training phase is necessary
in order to figure out the system polling baseline numbers from
idle to busy. The highest poll count will be during idle, where
all polls are empty. These poll counts will be different between
systems due to the many possible processor micro-arch, cache
and device configurations, hence the training phase.
In the training phase, traffic is blocked so the training
algorithm can average the empty-poll numbers for the LOW, MED and
HIGH power states in order to create a baseline.
The core's counter are collected every 10ms, and the Training
phase will take 2 seconds.
Training is disabled as default configuration. The default
parameter is applied. Sample App still can trigger training
if that's needed. Once the training phase has been executed once on
a system, the application can then be started with the relevant
thresholds provided on the command line, allowing the application
to start passing start traffic immediately
b.Normal phase. Traffic starts immediately based on the default
thresholds, or based on the user supplied thresholds via the
command line parameters. The run-time poll counts are compared with
the baseline and the decision will be taken to move to MED power
state or HIGH power state. The counters are calculated every 10ms.
3. Proposed API
1. rte_power_empty_poll_stat_init(struct ep_params **eptr,
uint8_t *freq_tlb, struct ep_policy *policy);
which is used to initialize the power management system.
2. rte_power_empty_poll_stat_free(void);
which is used to free the resource hold by power management system.
3. rte_power_empty_poll_stat_update(unsigned int lcore_id);
which is used to update specific core empty poll counter, not thread safe
4. rte_power_poll_stat_update(unsigned int lcore_id, uint8_t nb_pkt);
which is used to update specific core valid poll counter, not thread safe
5. rte_power_empty_poll_stat_fetch(unsigned int lcore_id);
which is used to get specific core empty poll counter.
6. rte_power_poll_stat_fetch(unsigned int lcore_id);
which is used to get specific core valid poll counter.
7. rte_empty_poll_detection(struct rte_timer *tim, void *arg);
which is used to detect empty poll state changes then take action.
Signed-off-by: Liang Ma <liang.j.ma@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lei Yao <lei.a.yao@intel.com>
Acked-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>