When enqueueing/dequeueing to/from the ring we try to optimize by manual
loop unrolling. The check for this optimization looks like:
if (likely(idx + n < size)) {
where 'idx' points to the first usable element (empty slot for enqueue,
data for dequeue). The correct comparison here should be '<=' instead
of '<'.
This is not a functional error since we fall back to the loop with
correct checks on indexes. Just a minor suboptimal behaviour for the
case when we want to enqueue/dequeue exactly the number of elements that
we have in the ring before wrapping to its beginning.
Fixes: cc4b218790f6 ("ring: support configurable element size") Fixes: 286bd05bf70d ("ring: optimisations") Signed-off-by: Andrzej Ostruszka <amo@semihalf.com> Reviewed-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>