After code inspection, there is no way for eal_timer_init() to fail. It
simply returns 0 in all cases. As such, this test could either go-away
or stay here as 'future-proofing'.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
if (rte_eal_intr_init() < 0)
rte_panic("Cannot init interrupt-handling thread\n");
- if (rte_eal_timer_init() < 0)
- rte_panic("Cannot init HPET or TSC timers\n");
+ if (rte_eal_timer_init() < 0) {
+ rte_eal_init_alert("Cannot init HPET or TSC timers\n");
+ rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
+ return -1;
+ }
if (rte_eal_pci_init() < 0)
rte_panic("Cannot init PCI\n");
return -1;
}
- if (rte_eal_timer_init() < 0)
- rte_panic("Cannot init HPET or TSC timers\n");
+ if (rte_eal_timer_init() < 0) {
+ rte_eal_init_alert("Cannot init HPET or TSC timers\n");
+ rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
+ return -1;
+ }
eal_check_mem_on_local_socket();