static sfc_flow_item_parse sfc_flow_parse_geneve;
static sfc_flow_item_parse sfc_flow_parse_nvgre;
+typedef int (sfc_flow_spec_set_vals)(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
+ unsigned int filters_count_for_one_val,
+ struct rte_flow_error *error);
+
+struct sfc_flow_copy_flag {
+ /* EFX filter specification match flag */
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t flag;
+ /* Number of values of corresponding field */
+ unsigned int vals_count;
+ /* Function to set values in specifications */
+ sfc_flow_spec_set_vals *set_vals;
+};
+
+static sfc_flow_spec_set_vals sfc_flow_set_ethertypes;
+
static boolean_t
sfc_flow_is_zero(const uint8_t *buf, unsigned int size)
{
if (rc != 0)
return rc;
- /*
- * If "spec" is not set, could be any Ethernet, but for the inner frame
- * type of destination MAC must be set
- */
- if (spec == NULL) {
- if (is_ifrm)
- goto fail_bad_ifrm_dst_mac;
- else
- return 0;
- }
+ /* If "spec" is not set, could be any Ethernet */
+ if (spec == NULL)
+ return 0;
if (is_same_ether_addr(&mask->dst, &supp_mask.dst)) {
efx_spec->efs_match_flags |= is_ifrm ?
EFX_FILTER_MATCH_UNKNOWN_MCAST_DST;
} else if (!is_zero_ether_addr(&mask->dst)) {
goto fail_bad_mask;
- } else if (is_ifrm) {
- goto fail_bad_ifrm_dst_mac;
}
/*
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"Bad mask in the ETH pattern item");
return -rte_errno;
-
-fail_bad_ifrm_dst_mac:
- rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
- RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
- "Type of destination MAC address in inner frame "
- "must be set");
- return -rte_errno;
}
/**
}
}
- if (!(efx_spec->efs_match_flags & EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE)) {
- rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
- RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
- "Outer frame EtherType in pattern with tunneling "
- "must be set");
- return -rte_errno;
- } else if (efx_spec->efs_ether_type != EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4 &&
- efx_spec->efs_ether_type != EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6) {
+ if (efx_spec->efs_match_flags & EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE &&
+ efx_spec->efs_ether_type != EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4 &&
+ efx_spec->efs_ether_type != EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6) {
rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"Outer frame EtherType in pattern with tunneling "
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * Set the EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE match flag and EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4 and
+ * EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6 values of the corresponding field in the same
+ * specifications after copying.
+ *
+ * @param spec[in, out]
+ * SFC flow specification to update.
+ * @param filters_count_for_one_val[in]
+ * How many specifications should have the same EtherType value, what is the
+ * number of specifications before copying.
+ * @param error[out]
+ * Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
+ */
+static int
+sfc_flow_set_ethertypes(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
+ unsigned int filters_count_for_one_val,
+ struct rte_flow_error *error)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ static const uint16_t vals[] = {
+ EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV4, EFX_ETHER_TYPE_IPV6
+ };
+
+ if (filters_count_for_one_val * RTE_DIM(vals) != spec->count) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
+ "Number of specifications is incorrect "
+ "while copying by Ethertype");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < spec->count; i++) {
+ spec->filters[i].efs_match_flags |=
+ EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE;
+
+ /*
+ * The check above ensures that
+ * filters_count_for_one_val is not 0
+ */
+ spec->filters[i].efs_ether_type =
+ vals[i / filters_count_for_one_val];
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Match flags that can be automatically added to filters */
+static const struct sfc_flow_copy_flag sfc_flow_copy_flags[] = {
+ {
+ .flag = EFX_FILTER_MATCH_ETHER_TYPE,
+ .vals_count = 2,
+ .set_vals = sfc_flow_set_ethertypes,
+ },
+};
+
+/* Get item from array sfc_flow_copy_flags */
+static const struct sfc_flow_copy_flag *
+sfc_flow_get_copy_flag(efx_filter_match_flags_t flag)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_flow_copy_flags); i++) {
+ if (sfc_flow_copy_flags[i].flag == flag)
+ return &sfc_flow_copy_flags[i];
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Make copies of the specifications, set match flag and values
+ * of the field that corresponds to it.
+ *
+ * @param spec[in, out]
+ * SFC flow specification to update.
+ * @param flag[in]
+ * The match flag to add.
+ * @param error[out]
+ * Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
+ */
+static int
+sfc_flow_spec_add_match_flag(struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t flag,
+ struct rte_flow_error *error)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int new_filters_count;
+ unsigned int filters_count_for_one_val;
+ const struct sfc_flow_copy_flag *copy_flag;
+ int rc;
+
+ copy_flag = sfc_flow_get_copy_flag(flag);
+ if (copy_flag == NULL) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
+ "Unsupported spec field for copying");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+
+ new_filters_count = spec->count * copy_flag->vals_count;
+ if (new_filters_count > SF_FLOW_SPEC_NB_FILTERS_MAX) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
+ "Too much EFX specifications in the flow rule");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+
+ /* Copy filters specifications */
+ for (i = spec->count; i < new_filters_count; i++)
+ spec->filters[i] = spec->filters[i - spec->count];
+
+ filters_count_for_one_val = spec->count;
+ spec->count = new_filters_count;
+
+ rc = copy_flag->set_vals(spec, filters_count_for_one_val, error);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ return rc;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check that the given set of match flags missing in the original filter spec
+ * could be covered by adding spec copies which specify the corresponding
+ * flags and packet field values to match.
+ *
+ * @param miss_flags[in]
+ * Flags that are missing until the supported filter.
+ *
+ * @return
+ * Number of specifications after copy or 0, if the flags can not be added.
+ */
+static unsigned int
+sfc_flow_check_missing_flags(efx_filter_match_flags_t miss_flags)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t copy_flags = 0;
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t flag;
+ unsigned int multiplier = 1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_flow_copy_flags); i++) {
+ flag = sfc_flow_copy_flags[i].flag;
+ if ((flag & miss_flags) == flag) {
+ copy_flags |= flag;
+ multiplier *= sfc_flow_copy_flags[i].vals_count;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (copy_flags == miss_flags)
+ return multiplier;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Attempt to supplement the specification template to the minimally
+ * supported set of match flags. To do this, it is necessary to copy
+ * the specifications, filling them with the values of fields that
+ * correspond to the missing flags.
+ * The necessary and sufficient filter is built from the fewest number
+ * of copies which could be made to cover the minimally required set
+ * of flags.
+ *
+ * @param sa[in]
+ * SFC adapter.
+ * @param spec[in, out]
+ * SFC flow specification to update.
+ * @param error[out]
+ * Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
+ */
+static int
+sfc_flow_spec_filters_complete(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
+ struct sfc_flow_spec *spec,
+ struct rte_flow_error *error)
+{
+ struct sfc_filter *filter = &sa->filter;
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t miss_flags;
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t min_miss_flags = 0;
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t match;
+ unsigned int min_multiplier = UINT_MAX;
+ unsigned int multiplier;
+ unsigned int i;
+ int rc;
+
+ match = spec->template.efs_match_flags;
+ for (i = 0; i < filter->supported_match_num; i++) {
+ if ((match & filter->supported_match[i]) == match) {
+ miss_flags = filter->supported_match[i] & (~match);
+ multiplier = sfc_flow_check_missing_flags(miss_flags);
+ if (multiplier > 0) {
+ if (multiplier <= min_multiplier) {
+ min_multiplier = multiplier;
+ min_miss_flags = miss_flags;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (min_multiplier == UINT_MAX) {
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
+ "Flow rule pattern is not supported");
+ return -rte_errno;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(sfc_flow_copy_flags); i++) {
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t flag = sfc_flow_copy_flags[i].flag;
+
+ if ((flag & min_miss_flags) == flag) {
+ rc = sfc_flow_spec_add_match_flag(spec, flag, error);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ return rc;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+sfc_flow_validate_match_flags(struct sfc_adapter *sa,
+ struct rte_flow *flow,
+ struct rte_flow_error *error)
+{
+ efx_filter_spec_t *spec_tmpl = &flow->spec.template;
+ efx_filter_match_flags_t match_flags = spec_tmpl->efs_match_flags;
+ int rc;
+
+ /* Initialize the first filter spec with template */
+ flow->spec.filters[0] = *spec_tmpl;
+ flow->spec.count = 1;
+
+ if (!sfc_filter_is_match_supported(sa, match_flags)) {
+ rc = sfc_flow_spec_filters_complete(sa, &flow->spec, error);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
sfc_flow_parse(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
struct sfc_adapter *sa = dev->data->dev_private;
- efx_filter_match_flags_t match_flags =
- flow->spec.template.efs_match_flags;
int rc;
rc = sfc_flow_parse_attr(attr, flow, error);
if (rc != 0)
goto fail_bad_value;
- if (!sfc_filter_is_match_supported(sa, match_flags)) {
- rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
- RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
- "Flow rule pattern is not supported");
- return -rte_errno;
- }
+ rc = sfc_flow_validate_match_flags(sa, flow, error);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ goto fail_bad_value;
- /*
- * At this point, template specification simply becomes the first
- * fully elaborated spec
- */
- flow->spec.filters[0] = flow->spec.template;
- flow->spec.count = 1;
+ return 0;
fail_bad_value:
return rc;