memzone: fix unlock on initialization failure
authorGao Feng <davidfgao@tencent.com>
Fri, 7 Dec 2018 01:20:08 +0000 (09:20 +0800)
committerThomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:24:14 +0000 (12:24 +0100)
The RTE_PROC_PRIMARY error handler lost the unlock statement in the
current codes. Now unlock and return in one place to fix it.

Fixes: 49df3db84883 ("memzone: replace memzone array with fbarray")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <davidfgao@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_memzone.c

index b7081af..664df5b 100644 (file)
@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ int
 rte_eal_memzone_init(void)
 {
        struct rte_mem_config *mcfg;
+       int ret = 0;
 
        /* get pointer to global configuration */
        mcfg = rte_eal_get_configuration()->mem_config;
@@ -375,17 +376,16 @@ rte_eal_memzone_init(void)
                        rte_fbarray_init(&mcfg->memzones, "memzone",
                        RTE_MAX_MEMZONE, sizeof(struct rte_memzone))) {
                RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Cannot allocate memzone list\n");
-               return -1;
+               ret = -1;
        } else if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_SECONDARY &&
                        rte_fbarray_attach(&mcfg->memzones)) {
                RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Cannot attach to memzone list\n");
-               rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&mcfg->mlock);
-               return -1;
+               ret = -1;
        }
 
        rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&mcfg->mlock);
 
-       return 0;
+       return ret;
 }
 
 /* Walk all reserved memory zones */