The Rx scatter patch was accidentally setting the index of the
secondary receive queue in the primary receive queue's initialization
when the secondary receive queue wasn't needed and was disabled. This
caused some misleading hardware counters in some situations.
Fixes:
856d7ba7ed22 ("net/enic: support scattered Rx")
Signed-off-by: Nelson Escobar <neescoba@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: John Daley <johndale@cisco.com>
iowrite32(0, &rq->ctrl->error_status);
iowrite32(fetch_index, &rq->ctrl->fetch_index);
iowrite32(posted_index, &rq->ctrl->posted_index);
- if (rq->is_sop)
- iowrite32(((rq->is_sop << 10) | rq->data_queue_idx),
+ if (rq->data_queue_enable)
+ iowrite32(((1 << 10) | rq->data_queue_idx),
&rq->ctrl->data_ring);
+ else
+ iowrite32(0, &rq->ctrl->data_ring);
}
void vnic_rq_init(struct vnic_rq *rq, unsigned int cq_index,
uint16_t rxst_idx;
uint32_t tot_pkts;
uint16_t data_queue_idx;
+ uint8_t data_queue_enable;
uint8_t is_sop;
uint8_t in_use;
struct rte_mbuf *pkt_first_seg;
if (mbufs_per_pkt > 1) {
dev_info(enic, "Rq %u Scatter rx mode in use\n", queue_idx);
+ rq_sop->data_queue_enable = 1;
rq_data->in_use = 1;
} else {
dev_info(enic, "Rq %u Scatter rx mode not being used\n",
queue_idx);
+ rq_sop->data_queue_enable = 0;
rq_data->in_use = 0;
}