bus/pci: fix comment explaining device naming

The original triple negative was hard to read and the attempt
to improve the formulation was commendable, unfortunately the new
comment is the inverse of correct.

Fixes: a65a34a85ebf ("eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enums")

Reported-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gaetan Rivet <grive@u256.net>
Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
index b24c069..9b8d769 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
@@ -68,7 +68,9 @@ pci_name_set(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
        devargs = pci_devargs_lookup(&dev->addr);
        dev->device.devargs = devargs;
 
-       /* If the device is blocked, no rte_devargs exists for it. */
+       /* When using a blocklist, only blocked devices will have
+        * an rte_devargs. Allowed devices won't have one.
+        */
        if (devargs != NULL)
                /* If an rte_devargs exists, the generic rte_device uses the
                 * given name as its name.