mbuf: remove unused next member in dynamic flag/field
authorXiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:12:56 +0000 (15:12 +0800)
committerThomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Thu, 11 Jun 2020 07:32:43 +0000 (09:32 +0200)
TAILQ_ENTRY next is not needed in struct mbuf_dynfield_elt and
mbuf_dynflag_elt, since they are actually chained by rte_tailq_entry's
next field when calling TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(mbuf_dynfield/dynflag_list, te,
next).

Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf_dyn.c

index d6931f8..953e3ec 100644 (file)
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #define RTE_MBUF_DYN_MZNAME "rte_mbuf_dyn"
 
 struct mbuf_dynfield_elt {
-       TAILQ_ENTRY(mbuf_dynfield_elt) next;
        struct rte_mbuf_dynfield params;
        size_t offset;
 };
@@ -31,7 +30,6 @@ static struct rte_tailq_elem mbuf_dynfield_tailq = {
 EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ(mbuf_dynfield_tailq);
 
 struct mbuf_dynflag_elt {
-       TAILQ_ENTRY(mbuf_dynflag_elt) next;
        struct rte_mbuf_dynflag params;
        unsigned int bitnum;
 };